Journal profile
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine
ISSN 2993-5113 · eISSN 2472-0712 · Xia & He Publishing Inc. · USA · 4 issues a year · Founded 2016
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine: fully open access; APC about USD 980; review about 26 days (submission to first decision, publisher); community-reported acceptance: 34%; indexed in Scopus.
Scope
Aims, scope and focus
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine (ERHM) is dedicated to fostering scientific innovation by providing a unique platform for exploratory research and novel medical hypotheses. The journal accepts a wide range of topics, including innovative modalities and insightful theories related to the practice of medicine. The exploratory research published in ERHM does not necessarily need to be comprehensive and conclusive, but the study design must be rigorous, the methodologies must be robust, the results must be reproducible, and the hypothesis must be rational. Topics of particular interest include but are not limited to:New methods and concepts in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of diseaseNovel discoveries in all diseases and disease mechanismsRisk and prognostic biomarkersChanges in clinical paradigms and treatment approachesCutting-edge technologies that can help improve scientific understandingPreliminary findings that may change current thinking in a particular field
From the journal's Aims & Scope
Editor-in-chief Lanjing ZhangPublisher website
Rankings & indexing
CAS ranking and database indexing
CAS Journal Ranking
CAS Journal Ranking, upgraded edition (March 2025)Not covered
Not covered by this edition.
CAS Xinrui Journal Ranking (March 2026)Not covered
Not covered by this edition.
CAS Journal Ranking, previous upgraded edition (December 2023)Not covered
Not covered by this edition.
Database indexing
ScopusLetPub
International journal early-warning lists: not listed in any editionLetPub
Indexing the journal's website claims
EmbasePublisher website
As the journal's website lists them, not checked against each database; for Web of Science editions the records above apply.
Editions, and major and minor categories, are shown separately and never merged into one zone; check which edition your institution uses before you submit or report.
Metrics
Impact metrics and publication volume
Impact
- Share of gold OA articles
- 0%LetPub ·
Sources count differently and were observed at different times, so each source's own value is kept; "publisher" marks figures from the journal's website.
Review & acceptance
Review time and acceptance
- Average acceptance (community reports)
- 34%LetPub ·
- Acceptance rate (publisher)
- 21%Publisher website ·
- Submission to first decision
- 26 daysPublisher website ·
- Peer review
- Double anonymous peer reviewPublisher website
Community reports come from authors' own submissions (confidence 0.5) and are not a promise from the journal; for publisher figures, the journal's own definitions apply.
Fees & open access
APC and open-access policy
Fully open accessLetPub
Every article is open access; authors usually pay an article processing charge (APC).
| Source | APC | Fee waiver | License | Observed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher website | USD 980 / USD 650 | — | — |
The journal's website is authoritative for fees; sources were observed at different times and each keeps its own value, without averaging.
Submission
Article types and submission policies (journal website)
What to prepare3 items from the author guidelines
- Reference style
- Vancouver
- Templates
- Word
- Suggested reviewers
- Optional
Article types accepted15, with length limits
- case reportCase Reports should describe an individual patient or series of patients (normally less than three) that presented with an unexpected or rare condition that has…main text ≤ 2,500 words · abstract ≤ 250 words · figures and tables ≤ 4 · references ≤ 25
- editorial, beginning with “Dear Editor(s),” ~ 10 Editorial ~ 1 ~ 1000 words; Unstructured ~ 10 Case Report Unstructured; No more than 2main text ≤ 1,000 words · figures and tables ≤ 1 · references ≤ 10
- hypothesisPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…main text ≤ 4,000 words · figures and tables ≤ 4 · references ≤ 100
- letterPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…main text ≤ 1,500 words
- letter to the editorPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…Length not stated
- letters to the editorLetters to the Editor should describe timely issues related to a previous publication. These letters should use constructive and professional comments to expand…main text ≤ 800 words · figures and tables ≤ 1 · references ≤ 10
- meta-analysisPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…Length not stated
- mini-reviewMini-review Unstructured; No more than 250 words ~ 2 ~ 3000 words; Structured as Introduction, main body, and Conclusions ~ 70Length not stated
- opinionation, Discussion, and Conclusions ~ 25 Opinion ~ 2 ~ 1500 words; Unstructured ~ 20 Hypothesis Unstructured; No more than 25main text ≤ 1,500 words · figures and tables ≤ 2 · references ≤ 20
- original articleOriginal research manuscripts should describe experimental and/or clinical studies in biomedicine, including exploratory and hypothesis-driven studies of basic …main text ≤ 5,000 words · figures and tables ≤ 8 · references ≤ 50
- original researchPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…Length not stated
- research letterResearch Letter ~ 3 ~ 1500 words; Unstructured ~ 20Length not stated
- reviewPlease ensure that any manuscript you submit to ERHM conforms to the recommendations for ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Internatio…main text ≤ 3,000 words · figures and tables ≤ 10 · references ≤ 300
- systematic reviewA systematic review paper, as defined by the Cochrane Collaboration, is a review of a clearly formulated question that uses explicit, systematic methods to iden…main text ≤ 5,000 words · figures and tables ≤ 8 · references ≤ 70
- systematic review and meta-analysisSystematic Review and Meta-analysis Structured with Background and objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions; No more than 250 words ~ 8 ~ 5000 words; Struc…Length not stated
Policy excerpts from the journal's websiteAI use, Authorship, Conflicts of interest, Data availability, Publication ethics, License & copyright, Open access, Peer review, Plagiarism, Preprints, Self-archiving, Trial registration / reporting guidelines
- AI use Use of AI Tools by Reviewers
Manuscripts under review are confidential. Reviewers must not upload unpublished manuscripts, figures, tables, supplementary files, review reports, or any confidential manuscript-related information to public AI platforms.
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Authorship Author Contributions
The Authors’ Contributions should be provided in paragraph form following the authors’ names and affiliations and corresponding author(s)’ information. The manner in which each author was involved with the study or preparation of the manuscript is listed with the author’s name (shown as initials, within parentheses). Contributions that are acceptable for inclusion as an author are: study design, p…
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Conflicts of interest Conflict of Interest
All authors must check the ICMJE’s unified disclosure form. Each author should check the form to disclose any potential conflict of interest and is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the provided information. The ICMJE’s form could be downloaded here.
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Data availability Data Sharing Statement
A Data Sharing Statement is required for research articles through which readers will know how to access the shared data. Sample wording: The [TYPE, such as technical appendix, statistical code, or dataset] data used to support the findings of this study have been deposited in the [NAME] repository ([DOI or other persistent identifier]); The [TYPE] data used to support the findings of this study a…
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Publication ethics
Plagiarism screening via Crossref Similarity Check Model summary
All submitted manuscripts will be checked using plagiarism detection software (Crossref Similarity Check).
Source ↗Publisher website ·- License & copyright Copyright
Copyright retained by authors Model summary
Starting from 2017, the copyright on all published articles will be retained with the authors unless stated otherwise. Authors grant ERHM the sole, worldwide, and exclusive right to publish (i.e., print, publish, sell, and otherwise commercially exploit), reproduce, display, and store the published articles.
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Open access Open Access
Open access under CC BY-NC 4.0 Model summary
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine (ERHM) adopts open access publishing model, and all articles are distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Under this license, anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse these articles for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly cited. Manuscripts submitted for publica…
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Peer review Peer Review & Editorial Process
Double-blind peer review Model summary
The objective of the peer review process is to ensure the integrity and transparency of the research objectives, data, and conclusions.Editorial ProcessAll manuscripts, solicited and unsolicited, that are submitted to ERHM will be subject to the following double blind peer review process, meaning that the author does not know the identity of the reviewer, and vice versa.Step 1: Upon submission, th…
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Plagiarism Types of Plagiarism
Plagiarism is defined by the ERHM as use of information, including textual descriptions, figures/tables and data, from a previously published document without proper citation or reference to the original source. All submitted manuscripts will be checked using plagiarism detection software (Crossref Similarity Check).
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Preprints Preprint version
A preprint is the version of an article before peer-review. Authors are not requested to remove a preprint from a non-for-profit preprint server before submission. Upon acceptance, we recommend including an acknowledgement of acceptance on the first page, as follows:
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Self-archiving Self-archiving Policy
Self-archiving permitted without embargo Model summary
Authors of articles published in ERHM are permitted to self-archive the preprint version of the article at any time, and may self-archive the postprint and published version without embargo.
Source ↗Publisher website ·- Trial registration / reporting guidelines Study Reporting Guidelines
To enhance the quality and transparency of health research, ERHM requires all investigators to prepare articles according to appropriate EQUATOR research reporting guidelines. Each submission of an original article/systematic review/meta-analysis/case report/study protocol should be accompanied by an appropriate checklist as listed below. Authors can find more guidelines at EQUATOR and should indi…
Source ↗Publisher website ·
Excerpts are quoted from the journal's website; "model summary" lines are written by Workers AI and checked against the text. The journal's website is authoritative.
Profile
Publication details and official links
- Publisher
- Xia & He Publishing Inc.
- Country or region
- USA
- Language
- English
- Frequency
- 4 issues a year
- Founded
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2993-5113
- Electronic ISSN
- 2472-0712
- Official links
- Journal homepage ↗LetPub
- Submission system ↗LetPub
- Author guidelines ↗LetPub
- Special issues ↗Publisher website
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine
How long does peer review take at Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine?
The publisher reports about 26 days (submission to first decision); first decisions include desk rejections; the community-reported acceptance is “34%”; the journal's website gives an acceptance rate of 21%. Article statistics cover accepted papers only, publisher figures follow the journal's own definitions, and community reports come from authors' own submissions; none is a promise from the journal.
What are the manuscript requirements of Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine?
According to the journal's author guidelines: Reference style: Vancouver; Templates: Word; Suggested reviewers: Optional. A model extracted these from the author guidelines and each was checked against the text; check the latest version on the journal's website before submitting.
Which databases index Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine?
According to LetPub and DOAJ records, Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine is indexed in Scopus. The journal's website also lists Embase; that list has not been checked against each database.
Is Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine open access, and what is the APC?
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine is a fully open-access journal. APC about USD 980.
Sources and updates
The facts on this page come from LetPub, Publisher website; every figure is tagged with its source and the date it was observed, and conflicting values are kept per source. LetPub source page: view ↗ (archived 2026-08-26). Last updated: .