Public History Review

编辑在履行编辑职责时必须申报任何潜在竞争利益；当稿件来自其所在机构同事或其研究网络时，编辑将退出该稿件的决策过程，由无此关联的联合编辑或外部可信专家担任该文章的编辑；编辑对其本人投稿文章的同行评审或发表决定不参与、不施加影响。 模型中文摘要

Our editors are required to declare any potential competing interests in undertaking their editorial duties. In cases where a manuscript is submitted by a colleague at their own institution or from their resesarch networks, editors will remove themselves from the decision-making process. A co-editor, or an external trusted expert, with no such connections, is then asked to act as the editor for th…

涉嫌学术不端的问题将按照期刊编辑 COPE 行为准则所载指南处理。 模型中文摘要

Issues of suspected misconduct will be handled in accordance with the guidelines set out by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors.

自2014年3月31日起向本刊投稿的作者同意以下条款：作者保留版权并授予期刊首次发表权，作品同时以知识共享署名许可授权，允许他人在注明作者身份及本刊首次发表的情况下共享和改编作品；作者可就期刊发表版本的非排他性分发另行签订附加合同安排（如存入机构知识库或出版成书），并注明作品在本刊的首次发表。 模型中文摘要

Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms: a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this …

本刊基于向公众免费提供研究有助于更广泛的全球知识交流的原则，对其所有内容提供开放获取；这种获取方式与作者作品读者群和引用量的增加相关。 模型中文摘要

This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly an…

所有投至 Public History Review 的文章均由两名具备该学科领域专业资格的独立同行评审人评审；作者与评审人保持匿名；评审人的建议由编辑在决定发表与修改时予以考虑。 模型中文摘要

All articles submitted to Public History Review are reviewed by two independent peer referees who are qualified experts in the subject field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Reviewers' recommendations are taken into consideration by the editors in determining publication and revisions. For further information on best practice peer review processes, please see the COPE Code of Conduct for J…