Whatever

From its very beginnings, queer has again and again proved its unpredictable productivity, its irrepressible vitality, its unconditional refusal to be circumscribed, defined, tamed. Queer is, of course, well established in the field of LGBTI studies, where it has quickly achieved the worldwide recognition it deserves; in addition, today, scholars and activists the world over are spinning queer outwards in a range of new and exciting directions, such as (to name but a few) neuroqueer, animal queer, queer economies, queer pedagogies, or the queer politics of migration. Their daring and original work is a powerful testimonial to the productivity and vitality of a clusterof theories which deserve to be more widely known and applied, both in scholarship, teaching and research, and in activism, advocacy, and policy-making. We would like Whatever to host, facilitate and promote a conversation among scholars working with these theories, whatever their research interests, methodological allegiances, and disciplinary affiliations. At its most abstract, queer’s research programme hinges on the questioning of categories and the deconstruction of performances. Thus, a truly queer approach to scholarship and research cannot but begin by questioning the categories and performances which define normal and normative scholarly identities as they are constituted, exacted, and rewarded. Two of the most fundamental constructs in the production of academic normativity are the system of the disciplines, with its definitions, boundaries, and hierarchies, and the opposition between specialists and laypeople, which entails the systematic devaluing of the latter’s experiences and forms of knowledge, and the distrust of their abilities to achieve insight into their own predicament, and to elaborate viable solutions to their own problems. The forms and devices of normativity and oppression overlap and strengthen one another. This makes any faith in a reductionist epistemology of separate disciplines not only intellectually simplistic but politically futile. Queer theory is not an idle pastime but a basic and effective tool to achieve change: it can accommodate any disciplinary perspective because the world is bigger than any possible description; it can accommodate any methodology because the world is more complex than any possible model. Questioning the disciplinary and methodological categories on which scholarly work is based does not mean to be disciplinarily incompetent or method

摘自期刊官网 Aims & Scope

研究方向（LetPub）：Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

主编 Carmen Dell'Aversano出版商官网

中科院期刊分区表

CiteScore 分区（Scopus，2026 年 6 月版）

Scopus 按 CiteScore 在每个学科内为期刊排名，百分位 75 及以上为 Q1，每 25 为一档；与中科院分区是不同体系。LetPub

数据库收录

ScopusDOAJLetPub

国际期刊预警名单：各版本均未列入LetPub

期刊官网自述收录

ERIH PLUS出版商官网

其他：Google Scholar、EBSCO、ProQuest

期刊官网列出的收录清单，未与各数据库逐一核对；Web of Science 各子库以上方记录为准。

不同版本、大类与小类分别展示，不将不同评价口径合并为一个分区值；投稿与考核前请确认所在机构采用的版本。

影响力指标

CiteScore 2026-06

0.4LetPub · 2026-11-01

SJR 2026-06

0.1LetPub · 2026-11-01

SNIP 2026-06

0.37LetPub · 2026-11-01

h-index

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

i10-index

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

两年平均被引

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

Gold OA 文章占比

0%LetPub · 2026-11-01

不同来源的统计口径与观测时间不同，页面保留各来源原值；“出版商公布”为期刊官网自述数据。

平均审稿速度（社区反馈）

24 WeeksLetPub · 2026-11-01

投稿到发表（期刊自报）

约 24 周DOAJ · 2026-11-01

评审方式

双盲同行评审DOAJ

社区反馈来自投稿者样本，置信度 0.5，不代表期刊承诺；“出版商公布”的时间节点定义以官网为准。

• APC 费用说明 ↗DOAJ
• 开放获取声明 ↗DOAJ
• 许可与版权 ↗DOAJ

费用以期刊官网为准；不同来源的观测时间可能不同，页面保留各来源原值，不做平均。

摘录来自期刊官网页面，仅保留原文片段；“模型摘要”由 Workers AI 生成并经原文校验，以官网为准。

出版商

Università di Pisa

出版国家或地区

Italy

出版语言

English, French, Italian, Spanish

ISSN

2611-657X

官方链接

• 期刊主页 ↗LetPub
• 作者指南 ↗LetPub
• Aims & Scope ↗LetPub
• APC 费用说明 ↗DOAJ
• 开放获取声明 ↗DOAJ
• 许可与版权 ↗DOAJ
• 评审流程 ↗DOAJ
• 编委会 ↗LetPub
• 查重政策 ↗DOAJ