Verfassungsblog

As a general rule, we reject submissions with generic, AI-typical phrasing, as they require a disproportionate editorial effort to bring up to a publishable standard. The number of submissions containing clearly identifiable AI-generated phrasing has risen sharply. In almost all such cases, this affects the precision of the legal argument, the stylistic quality of the text, and the accurate repres…

As a general rule, we do not publish articles by individuals who are directly involved in the topic they are writing about in a legal, representative, or advisory capacity. This includes, for example, lawyers or employees of associations or other interest groups. The same applies to academics who have advised a party involved in the matter – for instance, by providing an expert opinion or particip…

Non-profit, transparent costs and funding; revenue used for operations, quality, and new formats. 模型摘要

Verfassungsblog is a non-profit organization and transparent in terms of costs and funding sources. All revenue is directly used to maintain Verfassungsblog’s operations, to ensure our high quality standards, and to develop new content and formats.

Creative Commons Licence CC BY-SA 模型摘要

Verfassungsblog is and will remain open access. This means that all content is freely available without charge to the user, the author or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they give ap…

Open Access. Reader-funded. 模型摘要

Verfassungsblog is and will remain open access. This means that all content is freely available without charge to the user, the author or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they give ap…

Editorial review by staff and, if necessary, Advisory Board members with expertise in public and constitutional law. 模型摘要

Each of the 800 articles that Verfassungsblog publishes each year undergoes at least one editorial review by one or more members of our 6-person editorial staff and, if necessary, by one or more members of the Advisory Board who have special expertise in specific areas of public and constitutional law.

Authors must not plagiarize in their submissions to Verfassungsblog. We request that authors give credit to the original sources of text, ideas, and pictures. If we spot plagiarized content during our editorial review, we may reject the submission. In case plagiarism becomes apparent only after publication on Verfassungsblog, we will either publish a correction or remove the contribution.