Tataloka

若稿件被决定为“小修后接受”，作者通常有10个工作日修改文章；若为“大修后接受”，作者则有15个工作日进行修改。 模型中文摘要

The author/s will usually have 10 working days to refine the article if the decision is ‘accepted with minor revisions’. However, in the case of ‘accepted with major revisions’ the author/s will have 15 working days to work on the refinement of the article.

未经作者明确书面同意，编辑不得将投稿稿件中披露的未发表材料用于自己的研究。 模型中文摘要

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Tataloka是由迪波内戈罗大学出版集团出版的同行评审期刊，该声明基于COPE期刊编辑最佳实践指南，阐明作者、主编、编委会、同行评审者和出版方等所有参与方的伦理行为。 模型中文摘要

Tataloka is a peer-reviewed journal published by Universitas Diponegoro Publishing Group. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the editorial board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Ethical …

所有发表的文章均为开放获取，以获得更广泛的传播和更高的引用概率，采用知识共享署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享（CC BY-NC-SA）许可。 模型中文摘要

All articles published are Open Access to gain broader dissemination and higher citation probability under the license of Creative Commons: • Creative Commons Atribution-Non Commersial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA)

本期刊提供即时开放获取，所有发表的文章立即且永久免费供所有人阅读和下载，目前采用知识共享署名-相同方式共享（CC BY-NC-SA）许可。 模型中文摘要

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently …

每篇投稿至Tataloka的稿件将由两名审稿人进行双盲同行评审，稿件对审稿人匿名，审稿人对作者亦匿名，最终决定由编委会根据评审结果作出。 模型中文摘要

Every manuscript submitted to Tataloka will be peer reviewed by two referees/reviewers. The mechanism is double blind. The manuscript will be made anonym for the reviewers, and so are the reviewers for the author/s. The final decision is made by the editorial board based on the review results.