Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care

APJCC 将作者定义为在研究的所有阶段以及稿件撰写中做出实质性贡献的人，且列名的所有作者均须对研究和所投稿件有贡献。 模型中文摘要

APJCC considers an author as a person who has substantially contributed to all stages of research, and the manuscript reports its results. On the other hand, all authors who are listed in a manuscript have contributed to the research and the manuscript submitted to the journal. There are many different definitions of authorship among different bodies that oversee authorship rights and responsibili…

在本刊网站输入的姓名和电子邮箱地址仅用于本刊声明的目的，不会提供给任何其他方或用于任何其他用途。 模型中文摘要

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

APJCC 高度重视科研不端行为，参照科学编辑理事会（CSE）的三类定义（虐待研究对象、伪造和篡改数据、盗用与剽窃），并遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》关于人体研究的原则，不发表未声明相关声明的稿件。 模型中文摘要

APJCC is very sensitive to research misconduct and uses all means available to prevent publishing miscounted research. Though there is no standard definition of research misconduct, the Council of Science Editors defines research misconduct broadly in three categories of action and conduct: Mistreatment of research subjects Falsification and Fabrication of Data Piracy and Plagiarism Protection of …

所有已发表文章均采用知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0 国际许可协议（CC BY 4.0）授权。 模型中文摘要

Copy Right:All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNon Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

本刊发表的文章为开放获取，依据 2003 年《贝塞斯达开放获取出版声明》，文章在发表后立即以 PDF 格式在期刊网站无禁载期地普遍免费提供，作者或版权所有者不可撤销地授予任何第三方使用、复制或传播该文章的权利。 模型中文摘要

Articles published in the Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care are 'open access'. A universally accepted definition of the term is provided in the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing in 2003: The article is universally and freely accessible via the Internet, in an easily readable format and deposited immediately upon publication, without embargo, in a PDF format on the Journal's site The …

APJCC 采用单盲同行评审，作者不知道审稿人身份而审稿人知道作者身份；投稿时作者可建议潜在审稿人（含地址和邮箱），审稿人必须声明利益冲突，被建议的审稿人不一定参与评审。 模型中文摘要

Peer Review Model: The review process for APJCC is a single-blind review procedure. This means the authors are not aware of the identity of the reviewers, but reviewers are aware of the identity of the authors. In the process of submission, authors are invited to suggest potential reviewers for their paper (including address and email). The reviewers MUST declare a conflict of interest. The sugges…

剽窃指未经适当署名引用而挪用他人观点、过程、结果或文字，自我剽窃则指无必要地在不同期刊重复发表自己的观点、数据和文字；稿件文本相似度超过 30% 将被退回作者以删除相似内容，APJCC 严格遵循 COPE 流程图处理。 模型中文摘要

Plagiarism is defined as the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. Another category of plagiarism is self-plagiarism, when the author publishes their own idea, data, and text in different journals when no need for such duplication exists. APJCC uses all means to detect plagiarism. As a matter of quality assurance, a similarity of m…