Archipelagos

Archipelagos 由 Columbia University Libraries 出版。按 OpenAlex 近年发文统计，该刊主要发表 Digital Humanities and Scholarship、Caribbean history, culture, and politics、Digital and Traditional Archives Management 等主题的论文，这 3 个主题约占 41.7%。（根据 OpenAlex 主题统计与中科院分区数据生成）

The transformation of the academy by the digital dispensation presents challenges to customary ways of learning, teaching, conducting research, interpreting documents, and presenting findings. It also offers immense opportunities in each of these areas. New media enable oration, graphics, objects, and even embodied performance to supplement existing forms of scholarly production as well as to constitute entirely original platforms. Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration have expanded enormously, information has been made more accessible, and research made more efficient on multiple levels. We scholars are called upon now, with some urgency, to adapt our investigative and pedagogical methods to an academic climate deluged by a superabundance of information and analysis. This has created opportunities for open-ended and multiform engagements, interactive and continually updating archives, databases, cartographic applications that enrich the geographic imagination with historical information, and online dialogues with our colleagues and the wider public. The need for such engagements is especially immediate among the people of the Caribbean and its diasporas. Information technology has become an increasingly significant part of the way that those in the region frame pressing social problems and political aspirations. Moreover, the Internet is analogous in important ways to the Caribbean itself as a dynamic and fluid cultural space: it is generated from disparate places and by disparate peoples; it challenges fundamentally the geographical and physical barriers that disrupt or disallow connection; and it places others and elsewheres in relentless relation. Yet while we celebrate these opportunities for connectedness, we also must make certain that our work in the digital realm undermines and confronts rather than re-inscribes forms of silencing and exclusion in the Caribbean. Our own impetus for creating a new platform arose from this continued need to raise the voices of those working to understand the impact of technology on our scholarly and cultural pursuits. At this very hybrid moment, caught between the analog and the electronic, systems of production, validation, and distribution of our scholarly and cultural work have reified to benefit large monopolies—indexers, database brokers, software vendors—whose ultimate motive is profit. In order to keep these large economic sectors thriving, access has been regimented. As Caribbeanist scholars, we find ourselves in the double-bind of a new master's house, both infrastructurally and historically. Stewards of an archive that cannot be disentangled from The Archive housed at major global institutions—whose mechanical image lies outside our control—and of our fragile, opaque archives in their saltpetered warehouses at the margins, we have committed to join those who are active in the design of our future memory. As the academy increasingly embraces the "digital turn," we ask the following: How might we, as editors, publishers, and ourselves Caribbeanist scholars, encourage and facilitate our colleagues' investment in the production and dissemination of the knowledge they generate? How will we go about cultivating both producers and reviewers of quality digital scholarship, and how will we help to ensure that this scholarship is recognized and rewarded by the profession? How might we encourage collaboration with, increase accessibility for, and otherwise work to narrow the gap between Caribbeanist researchers, especially those in the North Atlantic academy, and the communities we are committed to serving? To answer these and other urgent questions, we need in this moment to engage two critical functions: to understand and to build. For us, these functions do not follow one from the other, but rather operate in tandem. As such, we have thought through our platform with the same critical eye we cast on the archive, and our resulting infrastructure embodies our principles. We

摘自期刊官网 Aims & Scope

主编 David Scott出版商官网

编委会国家分布：未见中国大陆编委；主要国家 美国 1、法国 1、澳大利亚 1（共 3 位编委标注了国家） 编委会 ↗出版商官网 · 2026-11-01

中科院期刊分区表

数据库收录

DOAJLetPub

国际期刊预警名单：各版本均未列入LetPub

期刊官网自述收录

LOCKSS、Eli Scholar出版商官网

期刊官网列出的收录清单，未与各数据库逐一核对；Web of Science 各子库以上方记录为准。

不同版本、大类与小类分别展示，不将不同评价口径合并为一个分区值；投稿与考核前请确认所在机构采用的版本。

影响力指标

h-index

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

i10-index

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

两年平均被引

0OpenAlex · 2026-11-01

Gold OA 文章占比

0%LetPub · 2026-11-01

不同来源的统计口径与观测时间不同，页面保留各来源原值；“出版商公布”为期刊官网自述数据。

平均审稿速度（社区反馈）

36 WeeksLetPub · 2026-11-01

投稿到发表（期刊自报）

约 36 周DOAJ · 2026-11-01

评审方式

双盲同行评审DOAJ

社区反馈来自投稿者样本，置信度 0.5，不代表期刊承诺；“出版商公布”的时间节点定义以官网为准。

• APC 费用说明 ↗DOAJ
• 开放获取声明 ↗DOAJ
• 许可与版权 ↗DOAJ

费用以期刊官网为准；不同来源的观测时间可能不同，页面保留各来源原值，不做平均。

摘录来自期刊官网页面，仅保留原文片段；“模型摘要”由 Workers AI 生成并经原文校验，以官网为准。

出版商

Columbia University Libraries

出版国家或地区

United States

出版语言

English, French, Spanish

ISSN

2689-842X

官方链接

• 期刊主页 ↗LetPub
• 作者指南 ↗LetPub
• Aims & Scope ↗LetPub
• 专刊 / 特刊征稿 ↗出版商官网
• APC 费用说明 ↗DOAJ
• 开放获取声明 ↗DOAJ
• 许可与版权 ↗DOAJ
• 评审流程 ↗LetPub
• 编委会 ↗LetPub